Both Sides of the Jordan

My last post failed to expand on the new Jordanian cabinet, and there is a lot to discuss within Israel, so here it goes.

First off, Jordan. With a new cabinet will come new viewpoints, but there is one that is definitely not reassuring. Hussein Mjali is the new Justice Minister. But Mr. Mjali has some interesting views on the geopolitical situation at his western border. First, he rejects the 1994 treaty with Israel, and considers Israel a terrorist state. Which leads us to our second point, which is that he defended Ahmed Daqamseh, a Jordanian soldier who killed seven Israeli schoolchildren at the Israeli-Jordanian Island of Peace Park on the border. Now, with reports surfacing that he wants his former client freed, there seems to be some instability in Jordan that Israel should watch closely. Especially with a new cabinet coming in following the dismissal of its predecessor, populist moves make you popular, and what happens when the people decide they like the Justice Minister? Abdullah is going to struggle with this one, but he better recognize the need to keep Mjali in check or otherwise draw the ire of Israel and possibly destabilize relations.

And what of Netanyahu and Lieberman on the other side of the river? When Aluf Benn thinks you're being publicly emasculated by your deputy, there might be some problems. Netanyahu has lost a lot of his political capital to the coalition, and he doesn't seem to be gaining any back anytime soon. Fear-mongering by both Bibi and Lieberman won't help either, but Bibi has taken a step in the right direction by responding to Hizballah's Nasrallah with an acrid comeback. Bibi is losing control of his party and his coalition, and it looks like the cycle of parties in and out of party will continue in the coming election, whenever it arrives.

But the religious parties will remain, and people will be allowed to do stupid things like Dov Lior. So now, there will be a law that allows you to say whatever you want as long as the Torah backs it. This is a new low. But it is very possible that this backfires. Hell, soon you could see gay marriage legalized, or the rabbis completely removed from any sort of power. Unless the law has conditions that keep that from happening. And making an equivalence with "left-wing academics?" What a joke. Left-wing academics do not condone violence against non-Jews. If this doesn't make people stop believing in coalition politics, what will?

Finally, another right-wing proposal may find itself backfiring, as now it has been revealed that the leader of Im Tirzu is doing business with Iran. Im Tirzu is an organization that focuses on responding to any criticism to Israel, not admitting any missteps, which is exactly what Peter Beinart finds to be the main issue with American Zionism. Without some sort of internal criticism to actions, what is the point of free speech?